Is there Freedom of Choice in America?

It appears that Americans hardly have any choice over matters of real concern. Recently, there was a news that appeared in the

It's ironic that in a country that's supposedly free, you are not free to work on your own backyard. Sounds ridiculous !. For every silly thing that you may want to do in America (the land of the free) today, you need a licence or Right. In that context, some of the questions raised by the author and others are very sensible:

Even though you paid 100s of thousands to buy your house/land, you still don't own it if you stop paying your property taxes..
You don't own the water that falls in your backyard or roof top..
You don't 've rights to sell raw milk even if there are people ready to take it..
You don't 've rights to rear animal farms without registering it or tagging your animals..
You don't 've rights to take out to the streets to express dissent or demonstrate a peaceful protest (the essence of democracy) without first getting a permission from the authority.. (what if the authority denies?)..
You don't 've choice over which public school you want to send your child to but the govt. chooses it for you.. (the one down the lane in ur community)..
You don't 've rights to punish/discipline your own children for correction. If you do, you may stand the chance of losing your child to foster homes..
You 've little to no choice when it comes to vaccinating your child. If you don't, your child may be denied admission to schools. In certain other cases, you may even be charged with child-abuse & send to jail..

The list goes on...These are certainly not the marks of a free society or a democracy.

And finally, they are going to tag you..

Yes, even if one chooses to ignore all the points listed above, there's still evidence to prove that the Big Brother is closing in on its peolpe. One of the most compelling source of evidence is the Historic Interview which Aaron Russo gave a few yrs ago. It's been very popular on the internet and is widely known among activists, independent researchers/journalists and whistle-blowers. The entire interview is about 70 min but this 10 min excerpt from the same is as good as watching the whole.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

If this is not Big Govt.'s encroachment on personal rights and freedom, then I don't know what is..

We don't 've to go too far to find out how dangerously close America is to a fascist dictatorship today. See how much rights & liberties have been taken away from Americans just in the last 8 or 9 years alone. It's the closing down of a democrary. America is following the exact footsteps of Nazi Germany. Look at the striking similarities between the Patriot Act of 2001 and Hitler's German Enabling Act and see how they were enforced. It also warns about the 10 Key Dangers of The Patriot Act That Every American Should Know. If that's not enough, see Naomi Wolf's documentary 'End of America' where she neatly lays out the steps that every dictatorship (Italy, Germany, Russia etc.) has taken in the past to close down an open society. It's shocking to see how much of these draconian laws have been put in to effect already in America. If that doesn't wake up Americans, nothing will...

Further, it's not necessarily the ultra-conservatives who always drums up mass hysteria. A few weeks ago we saw how undercover agents (Police) were involved in the G-20 Riot Fraud in Toronto. Well, the American counterparts are pioneers of this art. There has been reports that the milita raids are a Govt. effort to provoke violence. Here's a very recent case where FBI Undercover agents were involved in provoking extremist groups to attack law-enforcement. See the article titled:

As Predicted, FBI Agent Discovered at Center of Alleged Hutaree Conspiracy

The so-called ultra-conservativism, right-wing extremism, militia group opertions etc., that's picking up momentum in the recent years (particularly after Obama came to power) are likely to be hyped more in the coming days. It is part of an ongoing effort to shift the focus of the 'war on terror' from external terrorists to internal homegrown American terrorists and we know where they are going with it. One of the ultimate goals (if not THE ultimate goal) in provoking these internal violence is to provide the country with the right kind of crisis so that the Govt. could step in and enforce gun control. Yes, Gun-Confiscation or Abolition of private fire-arms is the goal. YOU CAN BET ON IT. The criminals who run the government knows that in order to control the public and suppress any sort of resistance that may possibly arise from them, the civilians have to be disarmed first. Hitler said: "the most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow citizens to carry arms." In this scenario, the millions of people possessing guns in America are a threat to the sustenance of criminals in power. Hence, the civilians should be completely stripped of their arms; a Right granted by the US Constitution. It can't be any simpler than that when Attorney General, Janet Reno says: "Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal." Thus, prohibition of private firearms is the ultimate goal of the administration, and therefore the escalation of firearm related crisis (such as that in the above article) is an essential evil for them. There's a method to the madness.

Though a section of the public is waking up to this reality, much of the sheeple are still in the fantasy world in pursuit of the great 'American Dream'. As George Carlin puts it, the owners of this country know the truth and it's called the 'American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it.. It appears that Americans hardly have any choice over matters of real concern and the only choice Americans are left with is the choice over 24 different kind of bagels or the choice between a window seat or aisle seat in an airplane.

As Predicted, FBI Agent Discovered at Centre of Alleged Hutaree Conspiracy

Kurt Nimmo, 'Prison Planet March 31, 2010'

On Monday we asked you to count the hours before links to the feds emerged on this one – turns out it was 48.

The FBI had an informant inside the Hutaree group and he participated in the alleged conspiracy to kill law enforcement officers, according to The Wall Street Journal today.

In sworn testimony, Thomas William Piatek is described as a Cooperating Witness and an undercover FBI agent.

Thomas William Piatek is pictured at the bottom right. It is interesting to note that, unlike the other suspects, he appears not to be wearing a jail uniform.

“A spokesperson at the FBI’s Detroit office declined to comment on the undercover agent and any role such an agent may have had in the investigation. A spokesman at the Justice Department in Washington also declined to discuss specifics of the investigation,” the Journal reports.

It is not surprising that the FBI had penetrated the Hutaree group and an agent was apparently at the center of the alleged conspiracy. In fact, it is part of a well established pattern.

On March 20, Infowars.com reported on allegations that a federal agent acted as a provocateur in the New York synagogue bombing conspiracy case. Defense attorneys in the case argued in court that the plot was hatched and directed by a federal informant.

“They said the informant badgered the defendants until they got involved in the plot,” NBC New York reported. “They said the informant chose the targets, supplied fake bombs for the synagogues and a fake missile to shoot down planes. The motion said he also offered to pay the defendants, who attorneys alleged weren’t inclined toward any crime until the informant began recruiting them.”

“This whole operation was a foolish waste of time and money,” Terence Kindlon, a defense lawyer who represented a client in the New York synagogue case, told the Times Online. “It is almost as if the FBI cooked up the plot and found four idiots to install as defendants.”

Defendants in the New Jersey Fort Dix Army terror case painted a similar picture. “The only terrorist conspiracy was one planted and nurtured by the informant,” declared defense attorney Rocco Cip during the trial. The FBI’s role in the case was admitted by a provocateur. “The FBI informant paid to infiltrate a band of suspected terrorists in South Jersey said yesterday that he offered to organize their attack on U.S. soldiers, but only because he wanted to build trust and find out more about the group,” the Star-Ledger reported on November 11, 2008.

In Miami, the FBI case against the so-called Miami Seven came apart at the seams when it was discovered a government provocateur provided money, video cameras for conducting surveillance, cellphones, and suggested that the patsies target the Miami FBI office.

In 2009, it was discovered that supposed white supremacist and radio talk show host Hal Turner was a National Security Intelligence asset, a fact admitted by the third highest ranking FBI official in New York City. During a second trial held this year, Turner described how he was recruited in 2003 by the FBI’s Newark-based Joint Terrorism Task Force. He said he was paid “in excess of $100,000” by the FBI during his almost five years as an informant.

According to research conducted by Alexandra Natapoff of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the FBI maintains an army of at least 15,000 “confidential informants,” while the DEA admits to having 4,000 snitches. “But the number of informants working directly for the Feds is probably only a tiny fraction of the entire stukachi [a Russian epithet used to describe a secret police informant] population, given the uncounted masses of snitches working for state and local police agencies,” writes William Norman Grigg of the Pro Libertate blog.