....."The pioneers of a warless world are the youth who refuse military service"....... - Albert Einstein

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Global Warming Lie - II : Instrument of Repudiation

Concerned American citizens are encouraged to go through the following website and sign the 'Instrument of Repudiation' in order to stop Obama from ceding away your Constitution before he sign away the Sovereignty of America to the 'World Government' at the Copenhagen Treaty. However, I do not know how far it is going to be effective in stopping Obama from signing the Copenhagen Treaty as it may be your last chance to live in a free America.

The 'Global Warming LIE', after having picked up momentum in the past several years is about to reach its climax in December 2009, at the Copenhagen Treaty. However, most people are and were unaware of the media propaganda and the scientific fraud that were working behind to promote this idea up to the point where it is now. It may sound ridiculous as it is against the popular notion of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW).

We live in a virtual reality, a world filled with misinformation and disinformation serving the interests of the few elites and propagated by the very media that we turn to for our information. However, this mind-control technique is nothing new and has been at work for decades.

For instance, David Rokefeller, in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991, said:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries".

So we know that these main-stream media is not trustworthy anymore. Yet, more and more people continue to be victims of this mass mind-control machine. If that's not enough meat for you, here are some quotes from the pro climate-change cult and see what they think about this hogwash.

"We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public's imagination... So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts... Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest." - Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports

"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen." - Sir John Houghton, first chairman of IPCC

"It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true." - Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

"We've got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy." - Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world." - Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment

"The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe." - emeritus professor Daniel Botkin

"We require a central organizing principle - one agreed to voluntarily. Minor shifts in policy, moderate improvement in laws and regulations, rhetoric offered in lieu of genuine change - these are all forms of appeasement, designed to satisfy the public’s desire to believe that sacrifice, struggle and a wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary." - Al Gore, Earth in the Balance

"Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?" - Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

"A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation." - Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies

"The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are." - Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

"Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control." - Professor Maurice King

"Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable." - Maurice Strong, Rio Earth Summit

"Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it." - Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

"The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet." - Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation

"Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun." - Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

"The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil." – Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview

"My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world." - Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." - Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

"... the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion." - Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." - Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund

"I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems." - John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

"The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing." - Christopher Manes, Earth First!

"Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing." - David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club


Those were straight from the horse's mouth !..

Dick Cheney, in PNAC, September 2000, writes that: ".. And advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.

Here's another quote from Dr. Eric Pianca, Biologist from University of Texas
"And I actually think the world will be much better when there's only 10 or 20% of us left."

He is also quoted as saying:

"China was able to turn the corner and become the leading world super power because they have a police state and they are able to force people to stop reproducing."

The underlying theme or tone of most of their speech is that we are too many people in this world and there should be something done to cut down the population. Aren't they already advancing methods and measures to depopulate the world to 1/10th of what is now, as engraved in their '10 Commandments for the New Age' in Georgia Guide stones?

My questions to these cockroaches are:

What makes them think that their lives are precious than the lives of some poor slobs? Who are they to decide on the lives of other people or decide on other people's rights to live? If they think the world population is too much, why not they go kill themselves and be an example to others? Wouldn't that be the simplest or easiest solution?

No comments:

Post a Comment